Health & Safety and Regulatory Law Update
Health & Safety Update Issue 5 - January 2009  
Crown Office Chambers
News
New Legal Directories praise 'heavyweight' team
£250,000 fine following Theme Park fatality
Articles
The Polluter Pays...
Case Summaries – Health & Safety
Cambridge City Council v Kwik Fit (GB) Ltd
Gloucester CC v. T Ltd
HSE v. (1) Andrew Bell t/a AL Bell Construction (2) Lloyd Jardine Plc
R v. Tulip Limited
HSE v. MacIntyre Care
London Borough of Islington v. Everyday Angel Limited
HSE v. Cold Move Ltd
Norwich City Council v. PMA Systems (Cradles) Limited
Cannock Borough Council v. Incarace (& Philip Bond)
HSE v. (1) Brookfield Construction (2) Scheldebouw (UK Ltd
HSE v. Gary Marsh
Powys County Council v. ‘P’ trading as Bethania Adventure
Regina (CPS) v. Interservefm Limited
Case Summaries – Regulatory
Surrey County Council v. SC
R (Buckinghamshire Fire Authority) v. M Ltd
Environment Agency v. The Sunlight Service Group Limited
Environment Agency v. Woodstone Construction (SW) Limited
Inquests
Darlington & South Durham – October 2008
Useful Links
Chambers Website
Health & Safety and Regulatory Work at Crown Office Chambers
Send this newsletter to a colleague
Feedback
Email your feedback / Suggestions for future content
Subscribe
Click here to receive an email each time we post a new issue of our newsletter.
If you received this edition by email you are already a subscriber.
Contact us
For all clerking enquiries relating to our Health & Safety and Regulatory Law team contact Julian Campbell on 020 7797 8100 or via the email link.
Issue Archive
Health & Safety - R v Chargot Newsflash
December 11, 2008
"Trigger" Newsflash
November 21, 2008
Newsflash - Health & Safety
October 15, 2008
Health & Safety Update Issue 4 - Summer 2008
August 1, 2008
Health & Safety Update Issue 3 - Spring 2008
March 5, 2008
Health & Safety Update Issue 2 - Autumn 2007
November 14, 2007
Newsflash -The Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007
July 30, 2007
Health & Safety Update Issue 1 - Summer 2007
June 25, 2007
In this issue...

Welcome to the latest edition of the Crown Office Chambers’ Health & Safety and Regulatory Law Update. Of particular interest in this issue:

- An article by Simon Antrobus on the increasing trend of confiscation proceedings to recover the proceeds of environmental crime.
- A summary of a case concerning an accident at a stock car race track in which a spectator was injured.
- Details of the acquittal of an outdoor pursuits business owner following the death by drowning of a customer who hired a canoe.
- Case summaries involving fire safety charges against well known companies.
- Details of the fines imposed in environmental prosecutions relating to oil pollution and the over abstraction of water.

This month sees the introduction of the Health & Safety Offences Act 2008 – for details of this important new legislation, see our previous Newsflash.

Also, for details of the recent House of Lords decision in R v. Chargot, again, please see the recent Newsflash which considered the judgment.

The Health & Safety and Regulatory Law Team


News
New Legal Directories praise 'heavyweight' team
Publication of the updated legal directories at the end of 2008 has reinforced Crown Office Chambers’ position as one of the country’s leading sets in Health & Safety and Regulatory Law
Read or print full article>
 
£250,000 fine following Theme Park fatality
A theme park has been fined £250,000 after pleading guilty to a breach of s3 HSWA after a teenage girl sustained fatal injuries in a 100ft fall from a water ride.
Read or print full article>
 
Article
The Polluter Pays...
by Simon Antrobus
An increasing trend in environmental prosecutions is the use of confiscation proceedings to recover the proceeds of environmental crime. Whilst most regulatory criminal offences have managed to avoid the labyrinthine legal web that surrounds confiscation proceedings upon the sentence of a defendant, environmental offences have proven somewhat different because of the ability of prosecutors to identify specific pecuniary benefits attained through an illegal activity.

Read or print full article>
 
Case Summaries – Health & Safety
Cambridge City Council v Kwik Fit (GB) Ltd
Cambridge Crown Court, 26th-28th January 2008
The court allowed an appeal against the conviction of Kwik Fit in relation to 4 Health and Safety offences. It had been contended that the company had provided insufficient safety training to a new recruit and that this alleged failing had caused a serious accident to a member of the public and to another employee.

Read or print full article>
 
Gloucester CC v. T Ltd
Cheltenham Magistrates’ Court, 8th December 2008
Prosecution of a major food retailer arising out of an accident at work whereby an employee had 2 fingers amputated above the first joint in a dough divider at the Defendant’s bakery department.

Read or print full article>
 
HSE v. (1) Andrew Bell t/a AL Bell Construction (2) Lloyd Jardine Plc
Gloucester Magistrates Court, 20th November 2008
Andrew Bell (AB) was the sole proprietor of a business known as AL Bell Construction (ABC). ABC provides self-employed bricklayers to developers on a sub-contract basis. In 2006, Lloyd Jardine (LJ), the principal contractor and developer of a residential development site near Stroud, Gloucestershire, contracted ABC to provide bricklayers to build brick and blockwork shells to the properties under development. The site consisted of the renovation of three industrial buildings to provide five residential units and the construction of a further eighteen new units on a 1 acre site.

Read or print full article>
 
R v. Tulip Limited
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) - Hooper LJ, Davis J, Dame Heather Steel , 20th November 2008
The appellant company (T) appealed against fines totalling £265,000 following convictions for three HSWA offences. An employee of T had put his hand into a piece of machinery and lost part of three of his fingers.

Read or print full article>
 
HSE v. MacIntyre Care
St. Albans Magistrates’ Court, 4th November 2008
The Defendant, a charitable company which provides care for people with learning disabilities, pleaded guilty to an offence contrary to section 3 of the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974.

An accident had occurred when a carer employed by the Defendant was using a hoist to move a resident who had severe physical disabilities.
Read or print full article>
 

London Borough of Islington v. Everyday Angel Limited
Highbury Corner Magistrates’ Court, 28th October 2008
The Defendant operated a nightclub in Islington. The Local Authority prosecuted the Defendant following an accident on 9th June 2007 when a member of the public fell from a raised platform onto broken glass, sustaining a significant laceration to her leg.

Read or print full article>
 
HSE v. Cold Move Ltd
Liverpool Crown Court (HHJ Gilmour), 17th October 2008
Prosecution arising out of a massive ammonia release at the Defendant company’s cold storage warehouse that resulted in the death of an employee and minor respiratory injuries being suffered by colleagues and a number of firemen trying to rescue him.

Read or print full article>
 
Norwich City Council v. PMA Systems (Cradles) Limited
Norwich Magistrates’ Court, 16th October 2008
Prosecution under s2 HSWA 1974 against a limited company carrying on business as specialist access/cradle engineers in respect of an accident at the Castle Mall Shopping centre in Norwich. The company was engaged to undertake maintainance work to a high level access ladder which formed part of a gantry system used to clean rooflights.

Read or print full article>
 
Cannock Borough Council v. Incarace (& Philip Bond)
Stafford Magistrates Court, 12th September 2008
A spectator (middle-aged female) at Hednesford Hills Stock Car Race track was injured when a tyre bounced across the track and into the crowd. She sustained a broken pelvis. At the date of trial she had permanent residual disability. A further female spectator had some mild whiplash injury of a short term nature.

Read or print full article>
 
HSE v. (1) Brookfield Construction (2) Scheldebouw (UK Ltd
City of London Magistrates’ Court, 8th September 2008
Prosecution arising out of an accident to the employee of a sub-contractor of the first defendant in which he was crushed beneath glass that fell off an A-frame, suffering a broken pelvis which put him in hospital for 5 weeks. The injured party did not return to light duties at work for a further 4½ months after the accident as a consequence of his injuries.

Read or print full article>
 
HSE v. Gary Marsh
Bradford Magistrates Court (DJ Thomas), 19th August 2008
The Defendant is a Senior Manager, charged under s36 HSWA. (This section is very rarely used and was prosecuted once in 2006 and once in 2007.)
The Company (AB) had pleaded guilty to a s2 HSWA offence. The case against AB had been made on the basis of a systemic failure in that there was no planned maintenance or inspection system in its factory. An Employee had his arm amputated after being caught in an unguarded machine.

Read or print full article>
 
Powys County Council v. ‘P’ trading as Bethania Adventure
Wrexham Magistrates’ Court, 4th to 8th August 2008
The Defendant (‘P’) operated an outdoor activity centre from a boathouse on the banks of Lake Vyrnwy (‘LV’), a large reservoir covering an area of approximately 10 square miles, situated in mid-Wales. The Defendant was licensed to hire canoes and kayaks on the Lake, albeit within a predetermined operating area which covered approximately one-third of the overall area of water.

Read or print full article>
 
Regina (CPS) v. Interservefm Limited
Buxton Magistrates’ Court, 23rd July 2008
Interservefm Limited (‘Interserve’) were charged with a breach of s3 HSWA 1974 in respect of an accident which occurred during the removal of a crane from the HSL site in Buxton, Derbyshire in September 2005.

Read or print full article>
 
Case Summaries – Regulatory
Surrey County Council v. SC
Guildford Crown Court, HHJ Addison, 5th & 8th December 2008
The Defendant Company is one of the UKs leading provider of care homes, with over 720 care homes and in excess of 37,000 bed spaces. At 4.50am on 23rd January 2007 a fire broke out in the boiler room of one of the Defendant’s homes, Norfolk House in Weighbridge, Surrey.

Read or print full article>
 
R (Buckinghamshire Fire Authority) v. M Ltd
Milton Keynes Magistrates’ Court (District Judge), 26th November 2008
This was a prosecution under the Fire Reform Order relating to an inspection by the fire authority of a communal escape route at a Shopping Centre in Milton Keynes. The escape was inspected in the early hours of the morning and was found to have been seriously obstructed by bins and debris emanating from 4 separate businesses (3 of which were prosecuted, including M Ltd).

Read or print full article>
 
Environment Agency v. The Sunlight Service Group Limited
Kings Lynn Magistrates’ Court, 5th November 2008
The case concerned the over abstraction of water on a number of dates during 2007 from boreholes used by the Defendant company in their industrial laundry business. The over abstractions were in breach of a licence granted to the Defendant by the EA.

Read or print full article>
 
Environment Agency v. Woodstone Construction (SW) Limited
Blandford Forum Magistrates’ Court, 29th September 2008
Prosecution relating to an oil pollution of ground and surface waters which occurred in Dorset in early 2007.
The Defendant Company (‘WS’) was a subcontractor employed by KB to undertake groundwork and demolition on a construction site.

Read or print full article>
 
Inquests
Darlington & South Durham – October 2008
In October 2008 an Inquest Jury summoned by the Coroner for Darlington and South Durham heard evidence relating to the death of a welder who died when his van exploded.
Read or print full article>
 
Editor: Dominic Kay
Published by
Crown Office Chambers
Copyright © 2009 Crown Office Chambers Ltd. All rights reserved.
Created with Newsweaver